Should we keep our old fireplaces?

Comments (34)

A Babbsy
7 years ago
I'd keep the first (but with new tiling!) & ditch the second.

However you might need to replace both if you want a matching look!
Mari Wiliams thanked A Babbsy
sksj1
7 years ago
Keep the first and replace tiles with neutral mosaic type tiles. If you want to coordinate your new fireplace in the adjoining with this one I'd suggest getting one made in wood (or mdf) and paint it, but take some of the style/ shape from the other one to link them.
Mari Wiliams thanked sksj1
Related Discussions
Help! what should we do with our fireplace?
Q
Comments (13)
I smashed my own out when we moved here 24 years ago. It was vile what was in and I couldn't stand to look at it any longer. Hubby went to work with a fireplace in the house and came home to find it had gone. I took a sledgehammer to it. Was a great feeling. I can't see that there's anything to go wrong unless you have a gas fire installed in it and in which case get a Gas Safe engineer to cap it off. You'll obviously need to replaster the wall when the bricks have been removed but that's not an expensive job for that bit. Other to that have a smashing time ;-))
...See More
should we paint our limestone fireplace?
Q
Comments (11)
Which do you prefer? The warm creamy hue of the fireplace or the cool hue of the walls? They don't go, but I'm not sure I would want to put paint on the stone. One reason they don't go isn't just the hue, it's the tone. They are both light and this is exaggerating the difference. Is it possible to keep the other walls in the room the pale grey and do just this wall and woodwork a much deeper colour?
...See More
What should we do with our kitchen diner family space?
Q
Comments (18)
I guess this will come down to how much you want to spend, if you are prepared to do an extension out the back then assume you are comfortable with some structural work. Also if you are happy to lose the garage or some of it you actually have a much larger space to work with. If it were my house and I had the budget to do a complete ‘rejig’, i would do the following: 1. Push the bathroom, utility area and storage areas into the garage but still leaving a garage door with a much smaller ‘garage’ space for stuff we just dump in the garage. Add a door if possible to the garage much closer to the front door to access the storage area. Access the bathoorm and utility via the currently under stairs door. 2. Now move the kitchen to the right into the space currently occupied by the bathroom and study, creating space for a nice size island, room fo an American fridge freezer and tall cupboards etc. 3. Move the study to the left hand side, which would run from the garden wall where the first bifolds end down to the existing vertical beam column, effecitvely making use of this as part of that study and therefore it isnt just a column in the middle of the room. 4. You will be left with a large L shaped kitchen lounge diner, where you can either choose to have a play area in front of the kitchen or tv snug and dining area to the left of it or vice versa. Whatever suits! Obviously this is without seeing the actual spaces and room dimensions to see how much open space you would get but looks like could work from your floor plan. Maybe too much work though :)
...See More
should we keep these internal windows??
Q
Comments (22)
I had a 60's bungalow with these windows and needed to remove one when combining a bathroom and loo. In my opinion simply boarding over the frame would look a mess. To do the job properly I had to carefully remove the old brittle glass. Cut back the frame and create a rebate. Insert an additional stud, board over and skim with plaster. It's quite a fiddle but the materials are cheap if you have the tools and time. I employed a plasterer for skimming. I would strongly advise leaving things as they are, changing the glass if you prefer and spending your money elsewhere. If your other half can't live with the transom windows, and looking at your photos I would remove glass and frames, insert additional studs, board and skim. You could then extend the cornice right round the room but you might have to move the loft hatch over too. If you are considering altering your stairs your balustrade doesn't look like it would pass current building regulations. For child safety you must not be able to pass a tennis ball through any of the gaps. You don't have to change it but most professionals would want any upgrade to meet current regulations. Good luck with your new house.
...See More
User
7 years ago
the first one is definitely worth keeping :D

are you sure you don't want to paint it? I find that it is actually easier to paint ornately carved items as you don't get brush marks. A contemporary colour would make it get the attention it deserves. I agreee that the tiles need to be replaced tho!!

with the second one...firstly I would have a go at finding a similar one to the first- you never know what you could find out there :D or get one made-we did that with skirtings and architraves and coving bcos we couldn't find nice stuff that linked...and it worked out cheaper :D
Mari Wiliams thanked User
Jake Norris
7 years ago
I'd love that first one for my gothic revival flat. Please don't paint it! As said change the tiles.
Mari Wiliams thanked Jake Norris
Joanna C
7 years ago
It sounds like you hate fireplace one so you could sell it on to a new home. As you do like fireplace 2, you could replace the first one with sth similar. There's no point keeping things you don't like.
Mari Wiliams thanked Joanna C
Jake Norris
7 years ago
I'd be interested in buying fireplace one.
Mari Wiliams
Original Author
7 years ago
Thanks all! Really helpful to get different views on this. My husband really likes fireplace one so we're likely to keep it (though I'll let you know if we change our minds Jake!). New tiles is a must, I agree. We'll also start looking for something similar to 1 to replace 2, I think. We might be able to put 2 in one of the bedrooms or something...
tessaway
7 years ago
Sell it or you will grow to regret it if it isn't to your style or taste.
Not very attractive really.
Sven
7 years ago
I would personally remove both and buy something that I do like. Matching fireplaces do look very chic.
Jane Mockett
7 years ago
The first fireplace is huge and very dark,It might be easier on the eye if it was stripped and just varnished with a clear satin varnish.The fire itself is very small by comparison so perhaps making a bigger aperture for the fire ( and have less tiles if any) would make it work better.The Deco fireplace is too small for the room and tiles are cold looking.I would try and find something of similar promotions to the wooden one but less ornate and have a similar pale wood finish.
rosebud1969
7 years ago
Never ever get rid if the first fireplace - it is a beautiful period feature of your house. My house is Edwardian with similar fireplace and I have used Farrow & Ball paints - shades of green, Tallow on wood; brought outside in - house plants, old books about shells, birds etc and even a sheep's skull on the shelf, lol! (The Edwardians loved their natural history and it will compliment your home).
Mari Wiliams thanked rosebud1969
rosebud1969
7 years ago
Just to continue - I wouldn't paint fireplace - just use light colours in room or you will lose some of the lovely detail in carved wood. Have a couple of pieces of dark wood furniture in room too as this will help balance the overall look. Light colour sofas, curtains for eg, but dark colour vintage rocking chair, coffee table.
Mari Wiliams thanked rosebud1969
dwjudd
7 years ago
The first one keep, don't paint, and dont change tiles, just paint them, leaving the red side tiles. Chuck the other one out
Sonia
7 years ago
I love the first fireplace and wouldn't touch it, but my friend recently painted her old fireplace in Farrow & Ball Bone and it looks really good. I agree the tiling is horrid so replacing them with something that suits your eventual room decor may be a good idea. However, if you don't like it then flog it, you'll have people fighting over it I bet! The second fireplace is typical 1930's deco look which I personally hate and just a load of ugly tiles (I removed two in my house). It's your decision in the end, and I wish you lots of luck!
Mari Wiliams thanked Sonia
User
7 years ago
last modified: 7 years ago
I love the first one ,and would keep it.The tiles need to come out and be replaced with a full polished cast iron inset to reflect light, and a black hearth.I would paint it the same colour as the wall ,charcoal grey ,to minimise its size and hang a silver framed statement mirror above it. The rest of the walls and furnishings could be light coloured to contrast with the darker wall.The tiled one would have to go.My nan had one in her prefab and kept a bottle of port ,for emergencies, in the coal scuttle beside it! Didn't like it then,not too keen now. Lots of great ideas from everyone so good luck in whatever you choose to do!
Mari Wiliams thanked User
soozmacrae
7 years ago
Usually I don't like old features to be removed but in this case I would get rid of both. Sell the first one and replace the second. Keep the open fire places in both rooms. There are some beautiful fire surrounds repro or modern available.
design_conscious
7 years ago
The first one looks huge and probably too large for the room. I would take down the wood surround and sell it. Find a more appropriate smaller surround for the remaining tiled area. You could always paint the tiles as they are rather ugly. The second fireplace is a typical 1950s hideous style. Remove it and replace it with one that complements the re-newed No 1. There are many styles to choose from depending on the period you want to reflect. No. 1 can be anything you want. Hope this helps.
260538maggie
7 years ago
I had an old fireplace and husband said no way I'm I going to get it out. So glad he said this to me although it was a lot of painful hours I did strip it back down to its natural colour and then when this was done I went over it with bees wax. It was lovely in our lounge and I was so pleased he didn't give his permission to pull it out. It is a lovely fireplace you have so don't pull it out, but you have to strip the paint right back and wash it of course every time you strip it. Although a lot of work it's certainly worth it. Happy times ahead.
Mari Wiliams
Original Author
7 years ago
Wow thanks for all your opinions! Not a lot of agreement on #1 but it's very useful to hear reasons why we should or shouldn't keep it. #2 is definitely going!

260538maggie, how did you strip yours?
jillfryer90
7 years ago
it's awful in a modern light room. take it out..let someone else love it.
jillfryer90
7 years ago
take that one out and board up the hole...or if you have the funds take the chimney out all the way up and have more space
minnie101
7 years ago
Hi. Re the first one, as you're semi-detached do you know what your neighbours fire looks like? It appears to predate the house but in my search for an appropriate fireplace for my house I have seen a couple that are similar and supposedly Edwardian. personally I would replace both with something simpler of the period which can be picked up cheaply and will match your style. They don't need to match ( not sure if they would have originally?) but maybe tie in in some way be it wood surround, cast iron etc
PRO
Bio Fires
7 years ago
The first fireplace is a great piece. Definitely keep it, but update it by changing the tiles. I think the frame is a beautiful design and shape, but perhaps too dark for the style you're wanting to achieve. I would strip the frame to its lighter colour and paint a new varnish or colour depending on your interior.

You can replace the fireplace with a new bio ethanol insert. A traditional bio ethanol basket would be a perfect solution for your traditional mantelpiece, as its classic neutral style will blend seamlessly with the frame, whilst modernising your fireplace with a new life. As bio ethanol burns cleanly, you wouldn't need a chimney at all.

As for the second fireplace, you could also replace it with a stylish freestanding bio ethanol fireplace for a simple replacement. Or you could strip the outer tiles of the fireplace hole, and fill the hole with the same or similar classic neutral style insert as the first fireplace, matching the two together.
PRO
ON&ON
7 years ago
If you're looking for a contemporary solution take a look at Cowley Manor Hotel http://www.cowleymanor.com/gallery.htm they've just painted some of their existing fireplace in really strong colours either to match or to contrast the walls and they look great!
Juliet Docherty
7 years ago
I'm glad I don't have a period fireplace to ponder over, it seems quite a stressful decision.
PRO
Xenon Interior refurbs Marilyn Watson
7 years ago
That deco fireplace is awesome. No don't replace it
apismalifica
7 years ago
last modified: 7 years ago
The art deco one is stunning, keep it, or at least sell it on to someone who has a place for it - people ripped out Victorian ones in to 60s and we are still getting rid of the deco ones, which makes them rare and increasingly desirable. They are fragile and so easily damaged and it's a lovely example.
PRO
Solid Furniture Design
7 years ago
The first one looks amazing, would not do any thing with it at all!
Martine Gagne
7 years ago
Our house is 1860's and the various fireplaces have been changed along the way. The nicest looks just like your number 1 and is a real keeper, unpainted. To modernise it you could consider replacing the tiles with a solid surface (like marble) with distinctive veining. Its a great way to give a fresh and elegant twist to the more traditional wood surround. You may find a bargain at a stone yard (cutaways from bigs slabs etc...).
PRO
Kitty-lynne jones interior design (BIID)
7 years ago
The Edwardian fireplace is the correct proportion and age for the house. Hard to tell if it is actually original to the house or if it is Mahogany or Oak, but don't paint it. Wood has a beauty of its own if treated with a natural finish like Beeswax and the patina of age adds to the beauty. Certainly don't varnish it. One of the reasons it appears heavy in the photo is the oak surround on the hearth tiles. My advice would be to remove the wood hearth surround and install a wood floor in the room (perhaps oak and slightly lighter in colour than the fireplace butting up to the tiled hearth). This will will compliment the fireplace and ground it. You could remove the tiles (normally I would keep original tiles) but the cream and maroon colours in this instance do give an overall heaviness and don't particularly enhance the fireplace, however I would leave the tiles for the moment. The finished scheme should look classy and elegant with a neutral colour palette. If this is going to be a working fireplace than you may consider a grey slate hearth. This is the focal point of your room so getting it right is key. Wherever possible conserve original features.

The 1930's fireplace on the opposite side would appear original and most likely installed in the 30's. It is charming but not proportionally correct for an Edwardian house. But because it tells a story and is original I would be loath to remove it. Selling it on would be tricky as the tiles will most likely damage when removing them. I would keep both fireplaces as they will both sit well in a neutral colour scheme with a wooden floor.
Mari Wiliams
Original Author
7 years ago
That's extremely useful everyone - thanks!

Kitty, you'd strip the wooden one then? And any tips on how best to do that? I think I'd like it a lot better if it wasn't so dark.
PRO
Stonehouse UK
7 years ago
If you go down the replacement route as some are suggesting then a matching pair of Bath stone fireplaces would look fantastic in your home. You could opt for different designs in each room matching the stone or go for similar designs in different colour/type stone. In my opinion I would definitely replace no. 2.
Jonathan
7 years ago
I like the ornate wood surround and I think the proportions sit well in your age of house.
Personally in think the issue is the hearth and the insert. I think you feel it looks too heavy because it is the only dark thing in the room.
If you replaced the insert with cast iron and had a slate or granite hearth it would stand well in any interior old or modern. I also liked the earlier suggestion of floor boards.
In the next room I would try to replace the tiled fireplace with one with similar proportions as the first. Alternatively an oversized floor standing mirror with an ornate wooden (or darkly painted) frame would also help tie the two rooms together
Mari Wiliams thanked Jonathan

United Kingdom

Tailor my experience with cookies

Houzz uses cookies and similar technologies to personalise my experience, serve me relevant content, and improve Houzz products and services. By clicking ‘Accept’ I agree to this, as further described in the Houzz Cookie Policy. I can reject non-essential cookies by clicking ‘Manage Preferences’.

Should we keep our old fireplaces?

Comments (34)

Related Discussions

Mari WiliamsOriginal Author

Mari WiliamsOriginal Author

Mari WiliamsOriginal Author

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Mari Wiliams
Original Author

Mari Wiliams
Original Author

Mari Wiliams
Original Author