Giveaway: Ideal Home Show tickets and design consultations!
10 years ago
last modified: 10 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (252)
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
Related Discussions
Architect or Interior Designer (or both)?
Comments (6)Definitely hire an architect or architectural technologist. You will save you money and time if you employ a good one plus they will think of things you won't have done. Ask to see their portfolio and speak to past clients. A structural engineer may be required but let the architect / technologist coordinate as they should understand what works best and will also help you appoint an engineer who they've worked with who they know is good. The architect / technologist should be able to do the interior design aspect also but if the interior design is exceptionally important yes hire an interior designer. If you hire both it'll obviously cost more money. Ideally use a qualified professional, ARB, MCIAT, BIID, IStructE, etc. Not just planning and building regulations but other legislation to consider such as party wall act and shared drains. Whoever you hire should know what to do here and advise you accordingly.. Most of all hire someone who listens to you and delivers what you want. Hope it goes well....See MoreAwkward Victorian terrace house lay out - advice needed!
Comments (17)Hi all, Thank you so much for your posts and ideas. I really appreciate it! Well 6 years have passed and we still haven’t made any structural changes as we started a family instead! But we think we’re ready to make some changes now (just when its become more expensive than ever to do structural works!) A few things I forgot to mention in my original post is that the roof is a butterfly/London roof so its not a traditional pitched roof and would be expensive to make convert it. Plus we had to unexpectedly replace the entite roof this year because it was causing problems and didn’t have the time to think about a conversion due to the urgency 😫. The front door is next to the lounge (floor plan is upside down 🙃) I think we’re thinking of a ground floor extension now but ideally i’d love to separate out the 3rd bedroom so it has its own entrance and possibly make it bigger. The third bedroom is at a split level from the 2nd bedroom ie you have to go down 3 steps. But the roof above the 3rd bedroom is pitched and i’m wondering if its possible to extend into it and make it a study/4th bedroom. The pesky stairs still seem to be a problem! RE: John Botham thanks for your advice to be cautious as the layout differs so greatly to other properties on the street. Any advice, ideas or similar problems solved very much appreciated! many thanks SJ...See MoreHome layout dilema after plans approved for extension into barn
Comments (28)Hi Minnie, Thanks for this. You've had some serious thought into my predicament. There is a scale on the drawing but for you its approx 12m x 5.8 (external of the barn unit excluding 'link) but walls are quite thick. I do like your idea and think modern living, which i like tends to focus round a kitchen dining living space which doing what you say would achieve. I think I'm going to have to sketch up your ideas too and see which would practically be the better choice. We've probably spent most of our time obsessing over a really nice master, when actually you spend little time in it... well little time awake. so does it need to be so big. Id hoped to actually create a similar kitchen dining experience by removing the wall between the kitchen and living room to crate a bigger room. This would enable a small island and allow space for a dining table in the current front room and replacing the windows on the kitchen facing the garden with a more modern 'letterbox' picture postcard window to draw in the view. It was also my concern that creating this kitchen / dining in the barn would negate the need to use the original house as all family time would realistically be spend on the ground foor of the barn / bedrooms above. For what essentially is a compromise to what we had originally submitted to planning, i don't want to create anything that means the house becomes the subordinate or poorer relation to the new. It should flow and be part of the whole. I think if we went with the kitchen in barn (as awesome as it would be) wed just may as well not build the link and make a separate house minus your boot room of course. This would maximise our investment but I'm not a developer, Money is not the driver....See MoreHow are other designers offering remote design consultations?
Comments (6)Hi Tim & Mark, I feel your pain on this - especially those essential little clues you get from the dimensional survey. I don't think there's an easy answer, other than 'interrogating' the client for more detail! For example, recently I was working remotely on feasibility for a project where 2 walls were to be removed; no dimensional survey at this stage but I had a fair idea of the house type so had sketched it out to get a rough idea in front of me. When talking with the client by video I asked her to get the camera into the roofspace to show the roof structure, spans, purlins etc to confirm my suspicions that both walls were supporting, and just what they were supporting. This alone allowed the feasibility discussion to move in the best direction, given that the construction budget was too tight to allow for the necessary structural work in removing both walls. In broader terms, the simple answer for how to get the survey done is to glean all the information you can to make an 'educated guess' as to the house layout (from external photos, etc), then draw this out for the client to add dimensions to. It's often a very iterative process whereby you might get the external walls, windows, doors, etc but find that something internally isn't quite right - so back to the client by email / video / etc for photos / dimensions of a specific area until it all makes sense. In simpler jobs the detail in a specific area might be sufficient (eg the effected areas for a kitchen extension to bungalow with just a knock-through and roof junctions), while for other jobs we've gotten to an agreed feasibility design using the client's dimensions and then I've gone to site (Majorca, Henley, etc) to conduct the full dimensional survey for detailed design (obviously under different circumstances from today!). I don't think there's any doubt that remote design suits the feasibility stages better than the detailed stages, but if it makes a connection with clients, and is helpful to them, without incurring expensive travel, or breaking lock-down, then it can be quite useful. Although as I said above, for me nothing beats personal face-to-face contact. Hope this helps....See More- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 8 years ago


Olivia